Brand compliance
Brand standards fail at the last mile — a local post, a dealer-made banner, an off-guideline offer. Sizle moves compliance from after-the-fact policing to before-the-spend approval, without slowing dealers down.
By the time a non-compliant campaign is spotted in market, the money is spent and the correction is a dispute. Manual review of every asset chokes the NSC team, so checks get sampled — and the factory's brand report becomes an exercise in hope.
Campaigns clear dealer, manager, and NSC review against brand and program rules before money moves.
What every campaign must include — assets, disclosures, channels, proof — is explicit, versioned, and enforced at submission.
Who approved what, when, against which budget and standard — recorded on the campaign, ready for the factory.
SLAs, bulk review, and automated completeness checks keep the queue moving at network scale.
Through the approval workflow: campaign briefs are checked against configurable requirements before approval, evidence is validated against the same requirements after execution, and the full history is preserved for audit.
Yes — requirement matrices, approval chains, and program rules are scoped per tenant, market, brand, and campaign type, so one network can hold different brands to different standards.
It speeds them up: SLAs make review time visible, automated checks handle completeness, and reviewers concentrate on exceptions instead of every submission — days instead of weeks.
Tell us how your network runs today, and see the parts of Sizle that map to it.
