Comparison
Every dealer network already has a marketing operations system — a budget spreadsheet, an approvals inbox, a shared drive of receipts, and a quarter-end reconciliation ritual. The question isn't whether to have a system. It's whether the system can be seen.
Spreadsheets fork the moment they're emailed. Approvals live in inboxes only one person can search. Proof arrives as attachments named IMG_4021.jpg. None of it is wrong — it's just invisible: nobody can answer "what ran, what did it cost, was it approved, did we pay it" without a week of assembly. That assembly week, every quarter, is the real price.
Plan, approvals, evidence, and invoices attach to the campaign they belong to — the reconciliation is a byproduct, not a project.
Live budget and approval state for every market, brand, and dealer replaces the weekly chase.
Eligibility, caps, and required proof are configured once and applied identically to every claim.
Every decision is on the record with who, when, and against what — searchable in seconds, preserved for audit.
The one built around your network's actual shape. For automotive brands, NSCs, and importers supervising dealer networks, that means multi-tenant structure, co-op and MDF budget logic, approval workflows with SLAs, proof of performance validation, and reimbursement export — the checklist Sizle was built against. Generic project tools and horizontal channel platforms cover parts of it; the gaps land back in spreadsheets.
Budgets, dealers, and program rules load at onboarding, and campaigns start on the platform from the next planning cycle — no need to reconstruct history. Most networks run their first full cycle in Sizle within a quarter.
Dealers see a focused workspace — plan, submit, upload, track — not the NSC's supervision tooling. If a dealer's team can use webmail, they can run their campaigns in Sizle.
Tell us how your network runs today, and see the parts of Sizle that map to it.
